S I T E   M A P
HOME
   
Residents Association website
• Citizens initiative - Bankastraat   
• CentrumRing  
• Koninginnegracht - tram tunnel & chestnut trees   
• Koninginnegracht - facelift footpath   
• Haagse Milieuzone comes into force 16 April 2008  
• Long-term plan for cycle lanes   
• Citizens initiative - Riouwbrug   
<back  
 

   

C I T I Z E N ' S   I N I T I A T I V E :    B A N K A  S T R A A T

Work to start on remodelling upper Bankastraat & Bankaplein


19 October - 30 October 2009

Narrowing of intersection Bankastraat/Dr. Aletta Jacobsweg and installation of central reservation .

1 November – 30 November 2009

Bankaplein/Bankastraat

-  Extension of area around fountain on Bankaplein to narrow roundabout roadway;

-  Repositioning of road and parking-bay markings.

Accessibility
While work is being carried at the Bankastraat/Dr. Aletta Jacobsweg intersection, traffic will be diverted along Kerkhoflaan. Diversions will not be necessary for the other work planned.

Parking
During the work to reposition road markings parking will be curtailed. Signs will be erected to indicate when and where cars may be parked.

Safety
Although all precautions will be taken to preserve the safety of the public; children in particular should be warned of the dangers of such work.

More information
For any questions please contact the Contact Centrum on work days between 08.00 and 20.00: tel 14 070 and ask for Mr. N. Sickenga (operations manager).

Latest information about the roadworks and other projects: www.denhaag.nl/verkeersveiligheid

C H R O N O L O G Y

 

June 2009

The Bankastraat show will be on the road this year

After Alderman Peter Smit’s commitment to two of the four most important Bankastraat burgerinitiatief proposals at the city council meeting on 5 March, and his rally call to “get the show on the road”, initially everything went rather quiet on the implementation front.

In the meantime however a pedestrian crossing has been installed at the T-junction between hoge Bankastraat and Aletta Jacobsweg and the road markings repainted. In the normal course of events absolutely fine, but what about the simple, “unsurpassable barrier” that was promised!

Fortunately the Traffic Working Party has now received a detailed schedule of the reorganization of Bankastraat.

19 August – 15 September

The central reservation to steer and slow down traffic at the T-junction will be constructed;

  • The diameter of the area around the fountain on Bankaplein will be extended;
  • Traffic lane and parking bay markings will be applied to the road surface.

2010

The design for the reorganization of the broad section of Bankastraat is currently in progress and work will be carried out during the major revamp planned for 2010. This section of the street must become less of a “race track” and more of a  “village square”. Such a metamorphosis is entirely viable without sacrificing parking places and without contravening the regulations regarding the emergency services. Naturally local residents will be closely involved during the whole transformation process.

Willem van Gijn

 

5 March 2009

City council curtails Bankastraat metamorphosis

Alderman Smit rounds off with "let’s get the show on the road!"

The hour had come on 5 March for more than 1,200 residents of The Hague who had put their signatures to the burgerinitiatief last year and all those living in the Archipelbuurt. The Hague city council was to come to a decision on the citizen’s initiative for a safer Bankastraat to improve the quality of life along this important community artery. Initiative-takers Willem van Gijn and Robert van Moorsel took their places alongside Mayor Jozias van Aartsen in the council chamber of The Hague City Hall.

The initiative-takers were complimented from all sides for the manner in which they articulated and elucidated the wishes of so many. Initially Alderman Peter Smit adopted two of the four most important proposals of the burgerinitiatief. A simple but unsurpassable barrier will be installed at the T-junction of Aletta Jacobsweg and Bankastraat to reduce the speed of traffic. The diameter of the area around the fountain on Bankaplein will be extended. But the suggested cycle-lanes were rejected by the Alderman. The radical changes to the broad section of Bankastraat also found no favour with him: no widening of the pavements, no central reservation and no narrowing of the traffic lanes.

Fortunately Bankastraat appeared to be a familiar part of The Hague to the council members. And it is well known that Peter Smit often takes his life into his hands on the bike and chooses to use Bankastraat.

Fellow resident Bart de Liefde (VVD) called for Alderman Smit and the initiative-takers to work together to find a solution for the broad section of Bankastraat. At the request of Tymen Colijn (SP) and Wim Pijl (ChristenUnie/SGP) the council did not rule on arrangements for cyclists. This will only be considered once the cycle route from the city centre to Scheveningen has been decided. The Alderman hinted that this route did not necessarily have to have to follow Bankastraat. But should this indeed be the case then Bankastraat would have to be adapted at that point and could very well be to the detriment of parking facilities.

 

As far as the broad section of Bankastraat is concerned the council also went along with the initiative-takers to some extent. However for the major revamp of the broad section to be completed by 2010, the council and initiative-takers will have to tackle the problem of the renovation of what Willem van Gijn calls “our village square” together Concrete promises on wider pavements, and the narrowing of traffic lanes, in spite of pressure from Willem (even minus the central reservation), remained unforthcoming.

The city council unanimously sided with these proposals. Yet again, a small step towards the realization of the main pionts of the citizen’s initiative. In any event the die has been cast or to quote Alderman, “and now let's get the show on the road”. So the metamorphosis of Bankastraat in the next two years is definite. But this means that we, as initiative takers and community, together with the council and civil servants, the community police officers and many others, have to get a move on.

5 March 2009, Bert Kreemers

joint initiative-taker with Willem van Gijn and Robert van Moorsel

(Archipel & Willemspark working party traffic)

 

Bankastraat on council meeting agenda 5 March at 19.30

For a safe and pleasant Bankastraat we need a full gallery during the discussion on the burgerinitiatief .
The public council meeting will take place in the raadzaal (council chamber) in City Hall and begins at 19.30. The Bankastraat initiative is point two on the agenda and the initiative takers will put their case at the beginning of the session.

Support from the many signatories of this citizen’s initiative and other Archipel&Willemspark residents carries weight; so be there if you can. If not the discussion can be seen live on politiek.residentie.net


 

 

23 February 2009

Fietsersbond comments on burgerinitiatief

 

In a letter to the members of the City Council dated 23 February 2009, the Fietsersbond (Cyclists Union) gave its comments on the Bankastraat citizen’s initiative and the council’s reaction to the initiative proposal.

The letter includes:

- the reasons for the Fietsersbond’s support of the initiative

- what the Fietsersbond thinks of the initiative proposals

- the pros and cons of cycle lanes and the reasons why these should be the ultimate choice.

Complete letter (in Dutch).

 

17 February 2009

Report on City Districts Committee’s discussion on the citizen’s initiative

Questions, questions and yet more questions. Members of the City Districts Committee visiting the Archipelbuurt fired one question after another at alderman Peter Smit. The subject was the burgerinitiatief, supported by more than 1,200 Hague residents - especially those living in the Archipelbuurt - to improve the safety and quality of life on Bankastraat. Questions too, about the council’s policy for implementing the proposal made by the initiative takers.

Promises from the alderman came thick and fast, but he held to the central reservation solution for the transition from Aletta Jacobsweg to Bankastraat: it will form a simple but unsurpassable barrier and its effect on driving behaviour will be assessed after one year. The area around the fountain on Bankaplein will be extended by two metres so that traffic cannot race straight into the narrow section of Bankastraat.

The alderman is however blocking road markings along the whole length of Bankastraat to delineate cycle lanes. This brought an avalanche of questions from the Districts Committee members. Apparently the effect of similar markings on Frederik Hendriklaan has been negligible. So according to Smit this would not be the solution for Bankastraat either; even though scientific research suggests otherwise. The numerous Committee members who had flocked to the Community Centre have given the alderman plenty of extra homework to do before the city council meeting scheduled for 5 March, when a decision on the initiative will be taken.

 

The real litmus test however will be the wide section of Bankastraat. Initially the alderman swept aside almost all of the initiative’s proposals for a safer and more pleasant wide ‘Banka’: especially a central reservation along this section of Bankastraat, which he said would cause problems for the fire brigade and hamper the emergency services. Under pressure from the Districts Committee members, in particular Bart de Liefde who happens to be a local resident, and from initiative taker Willem van Gijn, the alderman, however, agreed to give the matter further consideration. Van Gijn argued for simple adjustments to improve road/traffic safety and the quality of life. He was quite rightly complimented for his lucid and professional presentation.

Afterwards everyone was satisfied, but a sense of uncertainty prevailed about whether the most important aspects of the proposal for a safer and better Bankastraat were yet within reach. According to the initiative takers the burgerinitiatief was “threatening to miscarry”, but thanks to all the questions put by the members of the City Districts Committee, the chances of a positive outcome are more likely. This we will know on 5 March, if the entire council committee rules on the citizen’s initiative.

BK - 17 February 2009

 

City Districts Committee to discuss citizen’s initiative Bankastraat

't  Klokhuis Community Centre

Celebstraat 4


All 1,177 local residents who signed the citizen’s initiative and also everyone else interested in safety on Bankastraat are cordially invited to be present at this discussion.

The initiative takers will be elucidating their proposal and it is chance for those in the neighbourhood to have their say too. Proposals put forward by the Mayor & Aldermen deviate somewhat from the original initiative and the A&W working party wants to be able to convince the Committee that our neighbourhood thinks that all wishes stipulated should be met.

Proposals concerning citizen’s initiative Bankastraat

from the Mayor & Aldermen to the council committee

Council committee to discuss the initiative 17 February

January 2009

The layout of intersection at Bankastraat and Aletta Jacobsweg will definitely be improved this year. The Bankaplein roundabout will also be narrowed and there will be clear delineation of parking and the centre of the road surface in Bankastraat. During a large-scale improvement plan in 2010, entrance and exit structures will be installed the length of Bankastraat. With these proposals the Mayor & Aldermen have given their concrete interpretation of the citizen’s intiative for a safer Bankastraat.

After examination of the traffic situation in Bankastraat and the proposals made in the citizen’s initiative, Peter Smit, alderman responsible for traffic, believes that there is now a good plan on the table for the introduction of measures that will lead to an improvement in road/traffic safety in Bankastraat.

A central reservation will be added to the T-junction between Bankastraat and Dr. Aletta Jacobsweg to prevent motorists cutting the corner here; they will have to actually slow down and break in order to turn off Aletta Jacobsweg into Bankastraat. The extension of the central fountain area on Bankaplein, thus narrowing the traffic lane, will also ensure that motorists reduce their speed. While clear delineation on the road surface will create an optical narrowing of the street and discourage speeding. And the new arrangement of entrances and exits into and out of the side streets will provide better visibility of the street and improve safety.

Not all of the citizen’s initiative proposals will be implemented. Bankastraat is too narrow for cycle paths and further investigation has suggested that a pedestrian crossing will not result in a reduction in traffic speed on Bankastraat.

The City News colomn of the www.denhaag.com website's Living in The Hague section

is now using text from our site.

 

20 August 2008

Work on hoge Bankastraat postponed till November

20 August 2008 – Yesterday the work was supposed to begin on the roundabout and the central reservation at the junction at the top of hoge Bankastraat. Unfortunately, it did not happen. On inquiry, I was told work would not now start until November 2009: a delay of three months.

A small peace offering was the receipt of two sketches of the replanning of the broad section of Bankastraat. Shortly, the Traffic Working Party will be meeting with the Council to discuss the plans. 

1. Broad section Bankastraat - showing central reservation
2. Broad section Bankastraat - showing cycle paths and readjusted central reservation(s)

As soon as we have any more news on decisions taken and realization, we will make it known on the website.

Willem van Gijn

 

Downloads of larger scale sketches 1 & 2

 

November 2008

Council decision on burgerinitief

27 November 2008 - The burgerinitiatief was accepted as admissible by the council committtee without any resistance. In the coming 12 weeks the substance of the initiative will be examined and Willem van Gijn of our traffic working group has been invited as petitioner to provide an explanation of the plan submitted.

10 November 2008 – The chairman of the municipal council, mayor Van Aartsen, advised the council committee to take up the Bankastraat burgerinitiatief. The council will come to a decision, concerning procedure rather than content, in their meeting scheduled for 27 November 2008. Deliberation and the decision-making process follows within eight weeks after the decision to take up such an initiative. This term can be extended by four weeks if necessary.

Should the council find the burgerinitiatief inadmissible, it is customary to submit the initiative to the council executive for advice.

 

October 2008

More than 1,000 signatures for a safer Bankastraat

More than a thousand residents in The Hague have put their signature to the “burgerinitiatief” petition for a safer Bankastraat and Bankaplein since lobbying started on15 September.

The 1,177 signatures were submitted to the city council on 28 October. This sort of initiative enables individual neighbourhoods to get important issues onto the council’s agenda.

 

September 2008

A safer and more environmentally pleasant Bankastraat is the goal of a special working party made up of local Archipelbuurt residents. By means of a burgerinitiatief (remember the Riouwbrug!) they want to convince the city council to agree to the reorganization of Bankastraat. See proposal text below.

The working party expects to be able to collect the necessary minimum of 750 signatures required for their proposal during September. Every Hagenaar aged 14 and older can sign the petition.

Residents will visit as many homes in the district as possible to gather signatures. Petition forms can also be found in the Klokhuis Community Centre in case you are not at home when working party members call.

You can also download the form if you prefer so that you can ask your family and friends to sign too (NB: only residents of The Hague aged 14 and over are eligible to sign).

Please deliver the completed form to the Klokhuis (Celebesstraat 4) or send it to Willem van Gijn: Bankastraat 95 A, 2585 EJ Den Haag. 

 

  

Direction Bankaplein

Direction Laan Copes van Cattenburch

 

 Sketches: Rob Douw

 

  

Proposal submitted to the city council of The Hague

Burgerinitiatief  Bankastraat (Archipelbuurt)

Initiative summary

Reorganization of Bankastraat through various means to improve road safety:

1. Changes to Aletta Jacobsweg / Kerkhoflaan / Bankastraat intersection so traffic entering the street is channeled via a roundabout;

2. Reducing speed on Bankaplein by extending area around fountain thus channelling and slowing traffic;

3. Stippled road markings along the whole length of Bankastraat to make motorists more aware of cyclists and where possible (Bankaplein) installation of actual cycle lanes;

4. A continuous pavement along the length of the broader section of Bankastraat and the narrower section, varying in width, with exits from Sumatrastraat  and Soendastraat.

5. Broad section of Bankastraat: a single traffic lane for traffic entering the street, creation of a central reservation and a widening of the pavement area;

Explanation of proposal

Bankastraat has become increasingly dangerous for pedestrians, cyclists and other road users. The volume of traffic has intensified because motorists and delivery vans use the street as a short-cut route. And the wide expanse of asphalt encourages speeding and double parking.

Although visibility at the intersection with Aletta Jacobsweg / Kerkhoflaan / Bankastraat is poor this does not have the effect of making motorists reduce their speed. Several serious accidents sadly prove this point.

Bankastraat serves as the hub of the neighbourhood but is coming under increasing pressure because of the situation described above. The victims are the residents, retailers and pupils attending the Archipel School as well as visitors to the two local cemeteries who use the street on a daily basis.

The proposed measures will improve road safety both by reducing the volume and the speed of traffic. Not only will Bankastraat become safer but the quality of life on the street will improve, and will thus have a positive effect on the whole district, including the retailers. 

Global estimate of costs

Around €600,000: estimated by DSO verkeer & infrastructuur (city development department)

 

 terug naar boven
 

 

K O N I N G I N N E G R A C H T   -   T R A M T U N N E L   &  C H E S T N U T   T R E E S

More ...

A&W chairman Wybe Taekema appears on THEXPAT.TV channel

17 February 2011 - The chairman of our A&W Residents Association appears on THEXPAT.TV talking about the horse chestnut trees along Koninginnegracht and the decision to reprieve them this week. View here

More about  thexpat.tv

thexpat.tv keeps you up to date with the many developments going on in our city. Everyday, it offer news items dedicated to Hague themes, to help you keep in touch with the city you live and work in. So keep your eyes open, there is always something new to see on tits news and special feature sections.

Post your own films on thexpat.tv
thexpat.tv has some news for the coming year! It isoffering you the opportunity to broadcast your own amateur film on thexpat.tv (max 2-3 minutes). So send your an MP4 file, and if it is judged as suitable, it will be online. For more information info@thexpat.tv

 

C H R O N O L O G Y

10 February 2011

A unanimous YES to preserve Koninginnegracht's chestnut trees

10 February 2011 – The final word on the fate of the majestic horse chestnuts along Koninginnegracht is a positive one! During the council meeting to vote on the above-ground proposal for the tram route, the outcome was unanimous: YES to preserving the chestnut trees along the waterside.

26 January 2011

Chestnut trees along Koninginnegracht still under threat
 
26 January 2011 – Mr. Frits Prillevitz, chairman of the AVN (The Hague’s very own Nature Conservation Society), appealed  – also on behalf of the A&W Residents Association – for the preservation of the chestnut trees along Koninginnegracht during a meeting of the Commissie Leefomgeving (Environment Committee).

Both the AVN and the A&W have urgently requested the Committee and the municipal council to prevent the majestic trees from being felled to make way for the version of the new tram route Alderman Smit is determined to push through, and to consider the advice published by the Adviesraad Monumentale Bomen (advisory body for historical trees).

The 25 splendid trees are in good health and with the correct care will very likely reach the ripe old age of 100 to 150. The adoption of the so-called bomenviaduct option would also help ensure their longevity. The tram tunnel Brainstorming Group is also calling for the preservation of the trees, especially the horse chestnuts.
 
A decision on the tram route along Koninginnegracht will be taken at a council meeting on Thursday 10 Februariy 2011

15 July 2010

Brainstorming Group wants new motor-traffic tunnel in The Hague

15 July 2010 - The Kamer van Koophandel (Chamber of Commerce) blames the congestion along the Koningskade/Raamweg route on motor traffic not public transport. This is why the KvK is in favour of a tunnel for motor traffic between the Utrechtse Baan and the Hubertusviaduct. Members of the Brainstorming Group, asked to advise on the subject by the alderman responsible for traffic, unanimously agree.

All parties agree that motor traffic on the Koningskade/Raamweg route in The Hague is too often gridlocked. Alderman Smit wants to construct a tram tunnel along the Central Station/Madurodam route. The extensive brainstorming group for public transport on Raamweg totally disagrees. Motor traffic is the source of the problem and this is where the solution lies.

There are around 100 million euros available for improvements to the public transport system between Central Station/Madurodam; the route that continues on to Scheveningen is one of the busiest in The Hague. The Brainstorming Group, consisting of community organizations, nature preservation groups and travellers lobby groups, as well as the KvK, advises on the most suitable options available. Eyesore solutions like a tram viaduct along Raamweg are rejected out of hand and similar variants do little to relieve the congestion. Traffic simulations indicate that trams contribute very little to the congestion and therefore a tram tunnel is unnecessary. Improvements to the current tram route would be more sensible and productive.

The Brainstorming Group’s will send its final report containing descriptions of all the variants considered to Alderman Smit, and the Municipal Executive will present its decision to the City Council after the summer recess.

Source: Regio TV 15-07-2010

 

11 March 2010

Council information evening on Koninginnegracht tram tunnel

11 March 2010 - The Nieuwspoort Press Centre was so jam-packed that members of the audience spilled out into the hallway, where it was difficult to hear Jantien Tideman, project leader from the Department of Urban Development (DSO), giving her PowerPont presentation. She explained the investigation being undertaken concerning the tram 9 service, the background history to the whole business and the approach that will be applied. The meeting came about because of a council motion taken on 4 February 2010 to conduct a detailed study to prevent any decisions being taken on the subject of the tram tunne before the proper homework has been done.

A feedback group has been formed consisting primarily of representatives from organizations who have a vested interest in the project. This group has been tasked to review various alternative plans in a series of meetings (16/3, 31/3, 22/4, 10/5) and to report back with its findings and opinions. Two strong objections were voiced, however, about the conditions under which the group would have to carry out its review:


1) the extremely tight schedule for the review process, which makes it practically impossible to compile a well-grounded opinion;
2) the members of this sounding-board committee must confine their review to criteria set out by the council. Willem van Gijn (working party traffic) will represent the A&W residents Association.

Photos: AVN

If a tram tunnel is located under Koninginnegracht, the magnificent chestnut trees will probably be axed.

 

Invitation from the Department of Urban Development (DSO):

Council information evening on Koninginnegracht tram tunnel

Thursday 11 March 2010
20.00 - 22.00 (doors open at 19.30)
Internationaal Press Centre Nieuwspoort, Lange Poten 10

The council is about to conduct a thorough study of public transport options along Koninginnegracht. A public information evening has been organized to provide details about the project, the reasons behind the study, its aims and the approach that will be taken.

The public will have the opportunity to ask questions and become participants in a brain-storming group.

21 January 2010

Public meeting of the VML Committee

(Transportation and Environment)

Thursday 21 January 2010 - At 9.00 at City Hall on Spui, under agenda point D1, the city council's Transportation and Environment Committee deliberated the question of a tram tunnel under Koninginnegracht.


Such meetings (in Dutch) can be followed on Internet via www.denhaag.nl/mijnraad
agenda (in Dutch)
Other council committees

 

January 2010

NO to tunnel for tram 9, YES to tunnel for NWH

On Wednesday 3 March 2010 we will be voting for a new city council.
Scrutinize your preferred party’s election manifesto and ask: 

  • Will the plan for tunnel for tram 9 be blocked?
  • Is there an intergrated tunnel plan for the NWH (Main North West Arterial Route) in the manifesto?
  • Is the blocking of the tunnel plan for Johan de Wittlaan in the manifesto?

All three points not only have serious consequences both for the quality of life of every Archipel & Willemspark resident and for access to their own neighbourhood, but also for every other inhabitant in The Hague.

If you want to hear first-hand what the party councillors have to say on these points, come to the specially organized meeting at the Klokhuis Communuty Centre on Monday evening 8 February.

 

Keep it on the ground, not under it

17 January 2010 - According to the AD newspaper, if the tram tunnel under Koninginnegracht does go ahead, tram stops remaining above ground will be near Sumatrastraat and midway between Dr.Kuyperstraat and Houtweg (NieuwUitleg).

But the stop near Sumatrastraat will not actaully be possible and the closest option will be the stop 150 metres further on at Riouwstraat (where there already is a stop). The stops currently at Laan Copes and Dr. Kuyperstraat will disappear and the one currently at Javastraat will disappear underground. And once a public transport system goes underground all kinds of other safety criteria come into play. This will probably mean that at Javastraat a new entrance will have to be built for the tram travelling to Schveningen and two lifts and escalators for this one stop: one for each direction.

The paper also states 12 particularly ancient trees and 40 others along the city side of the canal will have to go to make way for the tunnel.

Traffic chaos will also be part of the whole undertaking due to the installation of temporary sheet pile walls, well-point drainage systems, outlet reservoir tunnels and two sections of detour track 250 meteres long as well as the reconstruction of the narrow Javabrug, Dr.Kuyperdam and the Bosbrug, and possibly even the Raambrug (Laan Copes van Cattenburgh).

November 2009

OV (public transport) tunnel under Koninginnegracht

.

21 November 2009 - The council Municipal Executive's preference for  a public transport tunnel under Koninginnegracht has led to a raft of different reactions. As yet the Archipel & Willemspark Residents Association has not formulated its official response to the council’s plans.

We are posting some additional information to our original article on this website in preparation to voicing local public opinion.

      Familiar sight: tram 9 above ground on Koninginnegracht.

 

6 November 2009

Letter from Rover (association for users of public transport)

to city council re OV-tunnel Koninginnegracht

This association pointed out in a letter to The Hague city council that

1) Traffic problem

Koninginnegracht and Raamweg  (together with its intersections with Zuid-Hollandlaan, Dr. Kuyperstraat, Javastraat and Laan Copes van Cattenburch) is the biggest traffic bottleneck in The Hague.

Surveys into how the VCP (traffic circulation plan) functions, show that small-scale measure such as adjusting the frequency of traffic-lights do not help.

The situation for the tram service is also dire. During morning peak hours tram 9 runs every 4 minutes, while actual transport demand requires that it run every 3.5 minutes. The pressure on  the service will only intensify, if in the near future the growth in mobility has to be absorbed by public transport. The necessary increase in the frequency of the trams will lead to longer periods of “green” traffic-lights for the trams, bringing motor traffic to a standstill.

It is logical to seek solutions to the problem involving some kind of “underpass” approach. The obvious answer would be to put motor traffic underground and keep the tram stops on the surface. In the specific case we are discussing here, this would be the wiser choice, given all the branching-off of traffic involved.

2) Quick scan

In a quick scan DHV Group (consultancy and engineering services) investigated several tunnel variants.

There were five variations for a tunnel on the Koninginnegracht side. Each had its drawbacks:

  • Future uncertainty due to impossibility of a tunnel at the Bosbrug;
  • A drastic increase in the distance between tram stops and the inconvenient location of the stops meaning passengers would have to walk longer distances;
  • Virtually all of the magnificent trees along the canal would have to be felled;
  • Disruptive, unattractive tunnel entrances;
  • Narrow section Koninginnegracht cannot accommodate both the tunnel entrances and the remaining traffic.

There is no doubt that the unique beauty of Prinsessegracht-Koninginnegracht’s would be completely compromised.

The more acceptable DHV tunnel variants such as the Koningskade proposal has the advantage that tunnelling at the Bosbrug would be possible and motor traffic turning off at intersections would not be held up by the trams. Others would be too long and disruptive, too deep, hold up traffic or encroach far too much on the residential sections along the route.

What is clear is that the budget is far too low for realising a competent and acceptable solution to the problem.

3) Shortcomings of the quick scan

Other possible solutions to and aspects of the problem have either not been given serious consideration or have been completely ignored. For example:

  • Limiting the volume of traffic onto the CentrumRing (e.g. inner-city permits);
  • Under estimation of the consequences of the increased frequency of tram services and the difference new rolling stock might make;
  • The need to remodel bridges to accommodate new rolling stock and excluding the costs for this from the overall budget;
  • In November Rover proposed a tunnel under Raamweg from the Bosbrug to under the Hubertusviaduct. It has the same advantages as one of DHV’s variants and is shorter and potentially less disruptive on the surface. Even though the proposal exceeds the one-hundred million euro budget, as do some of those identified by DHV, its inclusion in the quick scan would have given a better picture of all the options.

The letter goes on to suggest other alternative interim solutions to spending one-hundred million euros on a tunnel that does not properly solve the probleem. It also requests the city council to undertake further investigations and to halt any follow up on their preferred short "gracht-variant”.

Full text (in Dutch)

5 November 2009

Motion from the Haagse Stadspartij and SP  on Koninginnegracht tram tunnel

During a sitting to discuss the Budget Programme for 2010-2013 (RV 120),The Hague City:

Confirmed that

  • The board of the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management has allocated money for the tram 9 route along Koninginnegracht;
  • On the basis of a quick scan the board has indicated a preference for one of the tunnel variants and wants to develop this further;
  • The choice of tunnel and how precisely it can be realised on Koninginnegracht is a matter that affects the interests of not only the residents and the users/providers of public transport but also the environment, access to the city and the cultural heritage in the immediate vicinity;

and the decision-making process on the tram tunnel along Koninginnegracht, including alternative route options, must be prepared in consultation with all interested parties and culminate in a council proposal.

Joris Wijsmuller   (Haagse Stadspartij)                              Ingrid Györmörei (SP)

 

15 October 2009

Council chooses tram tunnel under Koninginnegracht

15 October 2009 – On the basis of a study carried by DHV  Group (consultancy and engineering services), the council executive has indicated a preference for a public transport tunnel along Koninginnegracht as a measure to reduce heavy traffic. According to Peter Smit (Alderman for Traffic), “The state has allocated a budget of one-hundred million euros for the construction of the tunnel, with the proviso that it is completed before the beginning of 2013. Therefore the council has now commissioned further investigation into the option for a tunnel under the canal. This means that we can then finalize the route for the tram and tunnel this autumn.”

The tram tunnel is expected to provide the solution to the worsening congestion problems expected because of the increase in tram services along the route between Central Station and Scheveningen. This busy public transport artery slows down traffic circulation along the Centrumring and the parking route. The option chosen will mean a 700-metre tunnel running under the intersections Dr. Kuypersstraat, Javastraat and Laan Copes van Cattenburch.

DHV investigated other options such as a tunnel under the present tram route along Koninginnegracht, on the other side of the canal on Koningskade/Raamweg and under the canal itself. Extending the tunnel as far as Madurodam was also considered. However only the shorter options alongside or under Koninginnegracht appeared to be feasible in relation to the budget.

 terug naar boven
 

 

C E N T R U M    R I N G

Council Executive rejects rerouting of CentrumRing

5 November 2008 – A motion was carried unanimously by The Hague city council in 2001 to reroute the section of the CentrumRing, which now follows Laan Copes and Patijnlaan, along Telderstracé as soon as the “upgrading” of the NW Hoofdroute was completed. As we understand it “upgrading” meant the linking of the Landscheidingsweg with the Telderstracé by means of the Hubertustunnel, which was officially opened this September. But the Council Executive had to be reminded of its 2001 motion in 2007, as it seemed to have slipped their memory. A watered-down version was eventually adopted (the Executive had to “carry out a survey” into the rerouting) and in the meantime the results of this “survey” by Alderman Smit indicate that rerouting is impossible. Perhaps in 20 to 30 years? If the NW Hoofdroute between Scheveningseweg and nearby Kijkduin should also go underground? Residents could not have been given clearer proof of the local authority’s untrustworthiness. The Alderman considers the matter over and done with. We do not.

With the help of the opposition, the matter was rescheduled for an extra VML (traffic, environment and infrastructure) committee meeting on 28 October 2008. Five local residents put their case (Karel van Noordenne, Guus Nieuwenhuys, Tim Dike, Eveline Blitz and Wybe Taekema) assisted by strong support from the opposition parties D’66, CDA and in particular the Haagse Stadspartij. There then followed a fiasco of a performance by VVD Alderman Peter Smit and the coalition parties VVD, PvdA and Groen Links. Evidently it had been decided to ignore previously taken decisions, deeming the original reasoning irrelevant. The Alderman got lost in word games about the meaning of “upgrading” and seems determined to “upgrade” Laan Copes/Patijnlaan and Javastraat to a racetrack with even greater traffic volume. He has all kinds of measures up his sleeve to aid the freer flow of traffic so that even more vehicles can be squeezed through our narrow streets. Readjustment of the traffic lights for example so that the traffic gets the green light for longer. Peter Smit also wants tram 9 put in a tunnel so that traffic flow into Javastraat and Laan Copes is no longer “inconvenienced”.

Neither the health of the residents, nor their children, interests the city council one iota. The car has priority!  But we won’t give up.

In the meantime, the following round is already behind us – the VML committee discussions on the Flankerend Beleid bill on 13 November. What we understand by “covering policy” is measures aimed at driving down daily local and commuter traffic,  like “park & ride” facilities and other means mentioned earlier.

Once again there were many who wanted to have their say, including four from our neighbourhood. They emphasized that the covering policy amounted to little and that local and commuter traffic was in fact not an obstacle. And what is more, it did not even include the most obvious measure (the introduction of substantial paid-parking rates everywhere). The only thing the Alderman’s policy did “cover” was his measures to promote traffic flow, such as putting tram 9 in a tunnel under Koninginnegracht and the “green light” for vehicles travelling along Javastraat and Laan Copes. These measures will actually attract more traffic. Once again, we were supported by council opposition during this latest skirmish.

Being aware of the coalition’s majority, the Alderman deigned it unnecessary to utter one word in answer to our argument – a perfect demonstration of the arrogance of power.

Wybe Taekema, chairman A&W Residents Association


A&W Residents Association protests against CentrumRing through the district

Letter and Memo sent to the media and political establishment:

29 September 2008, The Hague

 

To whom it may concern:

The inhabitants of the Archipelbuurt in The Hague, in particular those living on Laan Copes van Cattenburch, Burg. Patijnlaan and Javastraat, are extremely dissatisfied with the policy exercised by the city council with regard to the traffic passing through their neighbourhood. Readings have revealed that the concentration of NO2 already exceeds acceptable levels and it can be assumed that this is also the case with dangerous trace elements (the council found that monitoring these was too expensive, even if it does concern the health of its citizens).

Yet the council thinks nothing of putting the Centrumring under even more pressure with the recent introduction of the “milieuzone” as well as their announcement about measures to stimulate traffic flow. This will result in a further increase in the volume of traffic, a rise in pollution and further erosion of the quality of life.

The residents find the way the council is risking the health of those living in our neighbourhood and moving these risks from one district to another as unacceptable and irresponsible.

The final straw came at the beginning of September when the city council with one stroke of the pen, nonchalantly caste aside the council decision taken in 2001 (to move the Centrumring from Laan Copes to Telderstracé after the “upgrading” of the planned route). As far as the inhabitants are concerned there could be no clearer sign of the unreliability of the city council.

Various relevant issues are presented in more detail in the memo attached. If you would like more information or details please get in touch with one of the contacts listed below.

Yours sincerely,

 

Wybe Taekema, chairman A & W

Contacts:

Eveline Blitz M Sc, tel. 070 3648727; email: e.blitz@wxs.nl

Guus Nieuwenhuys M Sc, tel. 070 3561582; email:nieuwenhuys@planet.nl

Wybe Taekema LL M, tel. 070 3636077; email: taek@online.nl

Memo text (in Dutch): Notitie leefbaarheid in A&W

VCP - Traffic Circulation Plan


Council is to look for a solution to polluted air over Laan Copes

Last year the pollution readings taken by the council on Laan Copes van Cattenburch appeared to be markedly higher than the acceptable norm. The council had its doubts about the accuracy of the readings so new laboratories were engaged and additional metering points installed.

The results were made public at an information evening on 15 May 2008 and indeed the pollution on Laan Copes exceeds the 2007 norm of 46 mg/m³: the average reading was 48.7 mg/m³.

According to the council, air pollution will reduce throughout The Hague because of, on the one hand, national regulations (requirements regarding emissions from cars for example) and, on the other hand, because of council action taken in accordance with the Actieplan Luchtkwaliteit. Considering the council is of the opinion – as we are – that this will probably not have the desired effect in relation to Laan Copes, it intends to investigate the implementation of additional measures. What would be the effect of reducing the left-turn, two-lane exit from Raamweg to one lane? What would happen if the traffic lights at Nassauplein are adjusted to encourage a freer flow of traffic? And what happens if the Centrumring is rerouted to the Telderstracé?

Dissatisfaction

Many residents gave vent to their dissatisfaction during the information evening. We have been asking for the implementation of measures to reduce traffic for more than ten years. However in the meantime traffic has increased so much it has become almost impossible to cross the Laan during rush hours. Why does the central milieuzone only extend to Mauritskade and not to Laan Copes? Why is the council yet again investigating all sorts of measures instead of actually testing them? And the fact that the council, as cool as you please, announced yet again that they are going to carry out a survey into whether the Centrumring can be moved to the Telderstracé, had the residents gasping with disbelief. This was – would you believe – decided way back in 2001 by the city council! And in June 2007, it tasked the Municipal Executive to again investigate whether that 2001 council decree could finally be implemented!

There was also much criticism when the Alderman announced that "dynamic traffic management" is to be introduced on the Centrumring; that is if Laan Copes and Patijnlaan do remain part of the Centrumring. This would mean large matrix signs suspended above the street (with information about the fastest routes, etc.), which in our opinion would be an unacceptable violation of this conservation area.

Promises

Eventually the Alderman made just two promises:

- the crossing points for pedestrians and cyclists on Laan Copes will be reconsidered

- the intended surveys will be completed and presented to residents before the summer recess.

We’ll keep our ears to the ground!

Eveline Blitz   


Investigation into air quality on Laan Copes van Cattenburch - 2007

The results of readings taken of the level of carbon dioxide (NO2) emissions in the street has led the Hague Municipal Council to the decision to carry out an investigation into the air quality on Laan Copes van Cattenburch. In the first four months of 2007 records indicated noticeably high pollution readings of carbon dioxide. The Council wants to establish one way or the other whether pollution on Laan Copes van Cattenburch has actually increased or whether perhaps something went wrong: that the readings are inaccurate for example.

Air quality levels
The Council sets standards for acceptable levels of air quality based on assessments of the detrimental effects of various pollutants. In addition, the air in The Hague is regularly monitored. In most cases pollution levels fall below the officially acceptable levels. However in the first quarter of 2007 the reverse was the case on Laan Copes van Cattenburch: the readings were higher than the calculated levels. A remarkable situation and one that the Council wants to get to the bottom of.

Investigation
The council investigation consists of three phases:
1. Monitoring the amount of traffic using the street;
2. Installation of extra measuring devises by two independent consultancy firms;
3. Analysis of the measuring devices by two different laboratories.

The results are expected to be made known in February 2008. Residents of Laan Copes van Cattenburch have already been informed in writing about the investigation and will be able to ask any questions they may have during an information evening to be organised.

 terug naar boven
 

 

K O N I N G I N N E G R A C H T   -   F O O T P A T H

Facelift for footpath along Koninginnegracht


August 2009 -  It has actually happened. The footpath that runs between Riouwbrug and the bridge near the Hubertusviaduct, which had become so dilapidated, has been taken in hand. It is wider, has an even asphalt surface and is protected on both sides by green railings; zigzagging now and again to accommodate the tall poplars lining the way. The (temporary?) manner of renovation implemented where it starts by Riouwbrug is less attractive. Safety is paramount for the council: all told between the houses along Koninginnegracht and those on Raamweg, you will encounter seven green fences. While the Raamweg residents are unhappy with the barrier running along the middle reservation of their road, the Archipelbuurt is pleased with the refurbished footpath.

 terug naar boven
 

 

Haagse Milieuzone comes into force 16 April 2008

Alderman for the environment Peter Smit and Minister Cramer for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment will officially launch the start of the so-called ‘milieuzone’ (anti-pollution zone) this Wednesday. This is one of the measures comprising the Actieplan Luchtkwaliteit 2007-2015 (air quality action plan 2007 – 2015).

This initiative aims to cut down pollution in the city centre. This has greatly improved compared to 20 years ago and the municipal council intends to continue the good work.

Unfortunately, Javastraat is one of the streets bordering but not part of the milieuzone. This means that we can expect even more traffic on Javastraat and on Laan Copes Cattenburch/Burg. Patijnlaan but certainly no improvement in ‘our air quality’!

 terug naar boven
 

 

Long-term plan for cycle lanes

The Hague Council's long-term plan (2007 - 2010) for 24 new cycle lanes in various parts of the city, including Javastraat, Laan van Meerdervoort, Carnegielaan and Alexanderstraat, is now available in a 36-page pdf document.

 terug naar boven
 

 

C I T I Z E N ' S   I N I T I  A T I V E  -  R I O U W B R U G

Late for school? The bridge had to be opened!

Riouwbrug officially open

    l. Alderman Smit; r. initiative taker Bert Kreemers

Photo: Auke Bloembergen

7 January 2008 - Early in the morning the new Riouwbrug was literally under the spotlight when Alderman Peter Smit (responisible for Traffic), Bert Kreemers (working party Traffic - Archipel&Willemspark Residents Association) and a number of pupils of the Aloysius College and the Wolters primary school showed up in the dark for the official opening of the new cycle link across to Raamweg.

 

 Cyclists eagerly wait to cross the new bridge./Photo: Auke Bloembergen


Realization of the Riouwbrug is the result of a burgerinitiatief (citizens initiative) proposed by Archipel&Willemspark Residents Association. The new bridge offers school pupils and other bike/moped users an improved and safer cycle connection across to Raamweg
.

C H R O N O L O G Y

20 September 2007

Construction on Riouwbrug underway

20 September 2007 – The Dienst Stadsbeheer (City Management Service) announced that construction will start on the cycle bridge opposite Riouwstraat connecting Koninginnegracht with Raamweg. As well as the building of the new bridge, the tram stops in both directions at the end of Riouwstraat will be relocated and extended. The existing cycle/pedestrian bridge across to Raamweg will also be renovated.

Construction will be carried out in phases between September 2007 and mid-2008 to preserve the safety of road users and the construction crews. Depending on weather conditions, the bridge is expected to be in use by the new year. The work could cause some inconvenience but homes and businesses will remain accessible throughout.

Project Manager cycle-projects
Richard van Hillo

12 July 2007
Construction schedule cycle bridge
Alderman Smit has offered his excuses by telephone for the lack of information about the schedule for the installation of the Riouw Bridge: the work on the new bridge is scheduled to begin in September.
“Alderman not taking citizens initiative seriously”
The Hague, 11 July 2007
The “Riouwbrug”, a crossing for cyclists between the Archipelbuurt and Benoordenhout, doesn’t look as if it’s going to materialize in the near future. Although The Hague municipal council promised to have the improved cycle connection installed before the beginning of the new school year, so far, the work has still not begun.
On 1 December 2005, 533 Hague residents requested a safe cycle and pedestrian connection between the Archipelbuurt and Benoordenhout in a burgerinitiatief (citizens initiative). Such a burgerinitiatief is one of the ways citizens are able to have a more direct influence on how the council functions. The 2005 initiative for the “Riouw bridge” was a success story. Within two weeks the necessary signatures had been collected and on 1 February 2006 the council committee for traffic and the then Alderman gave their full support to the initiative. Plans for an improved crossing between Raamweg and Koninginnegracht were submitted for public discussion and comment on 1 December 2006. There were no objections at this stage.
Last month, Alderman Pieter van Woensel (with responsibility for Traffic) was asked if there was any reason for the delay that seems to have arisen and why the council committee and initiative group had not been kept informed and when the new crossing would be installed. So far there has been no answer from the Alderman.
Some weeks ago a burgerjaarverslag (citizens annual report) was sent to the initiative takers in which it stated that the Alderman was striving to have the new cycle bridge ready for the beginning of the school year 2007/2008 (p. 29).
The hold-up and the lack of a response to questions about the reasons for the delay suggest that the Alderman is not taking the citizens initiative seriously. Members of the initiative group have requested council committee members to formerly illicit an explanation from the Alderman.
NB: Bert Kreemers, one of the original intitiative takers, is stepping down as spokesman. He can be contacted at 06-53152839.

18 January 2007

Cycle bridge from Riouwstraat to Raamweg definite

18 January 2007 - A decision made by the council authorities today means that the residents of Archipelbuurt and Willemspark can now definitely look forward to a proper cycle bridge over the Kanaal between Riouwstraat and Raamweg. There were no objections to the plans for the Riouwbrug at the information evening held on 30 November 2006, only positive comments.

Deputy Mayor Pieter van Woensel (with responsibility for Traffic) would like the bridge to be completed this year and the authorities have already started drawing up the final plans so that work can begin as soon as possible. According to van Woensel, The Hague is a new and safe cycle route the richer with this cycle bridge offering a fast and direct connection to many children in Archipelbuurt and Willemspark who cycle to schools in the neighbouring district of Benoordenhout. The dangerous situations regularly encountered on the pedestrian bridge will soon be a thing of the past.

As well as the cycle bridge, a new crossing point - for both cyclists and pedestrians - over the tram line along which tram 9 runs will be located directly opposite Riouwstraat. This will accommodate the longer platform required for the second phase of the RandstadRail project. The new cycle bridge will link up with the existing bridge on the Raamweg side carried on supports above the Kanaal.

With the installation of the cycle bridge, the Municipal Council is meeting the burgerinitiatief (citizens initiative) of the Archipelbuurt/Willemspark Residents Association, which was also involved in the development of the plans drawn up by the council authorities.

30 November 2006

Have your say about the new cycle bridge at the

information evening 30 November
in the community centre on Celebesstraat


On Thursday 30 November 2006, the municipal council is organizing an information evening between 17:00 and 20:00 in the community centre ’t Klokhuis at Celebesstraat 4. There will be an explanation of the plans and you can ask questions and make your opinions known.

Crossing over tram line
In anticipation of the second phase of RandstadRail, a change has been made to the plans with regard to the location of the crossing point over the tram line along which tram 9 runs in order to accommodate a longer platform. It will be moved so that it is directly opposite Riouwstraat. The crossing will also be widened to make room for cyclists and pedestrians.

Bridge over the 'Kanaal'
There is going to be a bridge for cyclists. It will slope gently downwards in the direction of Raamweg and link up with the existing bridge which is carried on supports above the Kanaal on that side. Where the two bridges adjoin at right angles to one another, a tight bend occurs requiring users, especially those on mopeds, to break and slow down. There will be plenty of space on the bridge for bike lanes in both directions.

 

Raamweg crossing
The reorganization of the intersection Raamweg/Waalsdorperweg has been incorporated into the Hubertustunnel project. The new situation will mean that there is enough space for cyclists and pedestrians and the congestion between those crossing the intersection and cyclists travelling straight on along Raamweg will be eased.

Pedestrians
The new arrangement concerning the use of the existing cycle bridge along Raamweg means that part of the lane for pedestrians will disappear and be rerouted along the existing pedestrian bridge. The distance pedestrians will have to walk will remain the same - and may even be shorter - and they will be the sole users because cylists will no longer need to use this bridge.


view from Madurodam direction

1 December 2005

Citizen's Initiative for safe connection between the Archipelbuurt and Benoordenhout

On 1 December 2005, 533 Hague residents requested a safe cycle and pedestrian connection between the Archipelbuurt and Benoordenhout in a burgerinitiatief (citizens initiative). Such a burgerinitiatief is one of the ways citizens are able to have a more direct influence on how the council functions.

 

 

 terug naar boven